Back to work
Passion projectSpeculative productUX case studyMarch to April 2026

Accordant

A platform that helps teams discover, compare, and confidently use design system components — through intent-based search, structured guidance, and direct integration with Figma.

Accordant — Search, understand, compare, choose, insert
Overview

A decision-support layer for design systems.

Accordant is a speculative product that sits between a design system and the designers who actually use it. It doesn't help author components or govern a library, it helps designers find the right component, understand it, and compare it against near-alternatives at the moment of choice.

The project spans concept, information architecture, and UI design, built around a fictional enterprise company called Stex with two active design systems.

Type
Passion project · Speculative product
Scope
Concept · IA · UI design
Surfaces
Web platform · Figma plugin
Year
March to April 2026
Why I made this

Designers can reach the system. Understanding it is another story.

The moment

Most of the time, choosing the right component is automatic. Designers focus on the flow, the user's mental model, and edge cases — components fall into place from memory.

But almost every designer hits moments where they need to check. And every check means leaving Figma, searching, reading, switching back, searching the library.

The workflow tax

The same act of checking guidance, repeated across a project, becomes a tax on flow. Multiplied across a team, it becomes a tax on the system itself.

Today: 9 steps across 2 windows9 steps, 2 windows
With AccordantWith Accordant web platform3 less steps, with comprehensive understanding
With Accordant plugin5 less steps
The problem space

Access is not the same as understanding.

Designers may have access to a Figma library and documentation site — yet still struggle to answer the simplest question of all: which component should I use here?

They fall back on memory, scattered docs, or team knowledge. The gap is not access — it's informed access.

Questions they can't easily answer

Questions designers can't easily answer

What erodes when choosing is unclear

What erodes when choosing is unclear
Research

What designers actually struggle with.

I coded 14 practitioner accounts published 2023–2026 using inductive thematic coding (Braun & Clarke). Eight recurring themes emerged.

01Near-alternative confusionModal vs. Prompt vs. Popover
02Documentation hard to findOr stale once they find it
03Components without limitsNo "when not to use"
04Drift between Figma & codeLibrary and prod desync
05Onboarding overloadSteep curve for new joiners
06Use case isn't coveredBend, build custom, or wait
07DS team as bottleneckRepeated questions, slow loop
08Built but unusedSystem exists, ignored

What we learned

Competitive landscape

Most tools document and govern.
None help decide between near-alternatives at the moment of choice.

01 / defaultFigma library
StrengthZero context switch — what designers already use.
GapName-based search only. No comparison, no usage rules.
02 / docszeroheight
StrengthStrong publishing. MCP + Assistant (2026).
GapRead-first. AI returns text, not structured comparison.
03 / pivotedSupernova
StrengthVibe coding & PRD generation. Design-to-code.
GapPivoted away from decision support — different product now.
04 / decision-supportAccordant
StrengthIntent search. Side-by-side comparison. Figma plugin.
PositionDoesn't author or govern — extends, doesn't replace.

Comparison is the missing primary view. Every platform sells to DS teams, but none is built for the consumer of a design system.

Design principles

Decisions, not preferences.

01Discovery should feel intuitive→ Browse with intent search
02Guidance appears before misuse→ Component detail
03Learning should be embedded→ Onboarding paths
04Comparison is first-class→ Compare as a primary surface
05Workflow matters→ Figma plugin extension
The product

One product, two surfaces.

The browser supports depth, documentation, and onboarding. The plugin supports in-context action.

A · Web platform — for depth

Browse the full system

  • Compare related components
  • Learn principles & onboarding
  • View detailed component guidance
Accordant browse view
B · Figma plugin — for fast in-context action

Search by intent inside Figma

  • See recommended components
  • View quick use-case guidance
  • Insert the best-fit component
Accordant Figma plugin
Information architecture

Four areas, one decision flow.

01BrowseSearchable library, filter by category and intent.
02CompareSide-by-side view of similar or confusable patterns.
03LearnOnboarding, principles, and curated learning paths.
04InsightsFuture: usage data and recommendation intelligence.

Search → Understand → Compare → Choose → Insert

How Accordant works

Two surfaces. Four areas. One decision flow.

The walkthrough below is set inside Stex, a fictional enterprise stack used as a working context for the prototype.

Context
Fictional Company
Stex
  • Multiple enterprise products in active development
  • Internal tools and customer-facing workflows
  • Two design systems: Enterprise and Mobile
  • A growing design team working across both
How it gets set up

Two ways to get started.

Whether your design system is documented or just lived-in, Accordant meets you where you are.

Path A

Connecting dots

For teams with existing documentation.

Connect Figma + your existing documentation. Accordant pulls components from Figma and structures your guidance against them.

Path B

Generating drafts

For teams without formal documentation yet.

Connect Figma only. Accordant generates initial drafts of intent, usage, and comparisons — team refines from there.

Both paths

Designers sign in to the plugin once.

01 · Browse

Search by intent, not just by name.

A designer searching "display warning" should not need to know the word "alert" beforehand — and can learn the names after.

02 · Component detail

Answer the questions designers actually ask.

Each component opens to a structured page with core guidance for everyone, every time — and advanced guidance for deeper, contextual work.

03 · Compare

Decisions live between near-alternatives.

Comparison is treated as a primary surface, not a footnote. Place two confusable components side-by-side and see how their intent, behavior, and rules differ.

04 · Learn

Teach through use, not isolated documents.

Onboarding paths, system principles, and curated learning sequences embedded in the same surface designers already use to choose components.

05 · Figma plugin

Guidance, inside the canvas.

For fast in-context action: search by intent inside Figma, see recommended components ranked against your query, view quick use-case guidance, and insert the best-fit component without leaving the file.

Reflection

The library isn't the product. The decision is.

Designers don't lack access — they lack a structural surface for the decision they're already making. Accordant treats comparison as the primary view, not an afterthought, and meets the work where it actually happens: inside Figma.

If Figma libraries make components accessible, Accordant's job is to make them understandable — and to teach by use, not by document.

Future step

Future steps

thanks for sté-ing

Sté is short for Steven— and it's a small wink at stay. It's the thread running through my work: design that invites people to stay engaged, art that holds attention, fragrances that linger long after the wearer leaves the room. Welcome. Sté with me a while.

Sté — Resume